It's a good point about the mesh, but a nice mini!
Over here we can buy mesh screens for sanding drywall for dirt cheap at a hardware store. They'd sure be in scale if you're interested.
Nameless in 2010
Forum rules
Post pictures and discussions regarding finished models here, please. If you have WIP (work in progress) photos, feel free to post them to the right section and feel free to add the link in your post about the finished work.
Post pictures and discussions regarding finished models here, please. If you have WIP (work in progress) photos, feel free to post them to the right section and feel free to add the link in your post about the finished work.
Re: Nameless in 2010
I wonder if the model wouldn't benefit from being based on an empty plinth...
-
Nameless
- The Better Choice

- Posts: 17415
- Joined: 21 Jun 2005, o 17:41
- Location: Silesia, Poland
- Contact:
9/2010 - Private Dancer
Reaper mini. Had some fun with see-through effect. I even managed to paint nipples this time. That's what I call a progress 
9/2010 - Private Dancer
Click to see full-sized image
9/2010 - Private Dancer
Click to see full-sized image-
Demi_morgana
- Chest of Colors

- Posts: 15233
- Joined: 9 Apr 2005, o 02:51
- Location: Eldorado
- Contact:
-
Hosea
Re: Nameless in 2010
If she is a private dancer, nameless may need to add an audience, lol.
Re: Nameless in 2010
I like the cloth effect, but i feel the skin could be a little neater in places and possibly the details on the face could be better defined. But saying that the mini does look very small.
Re: Nameless in 2010
The cloth and transparency effect turned out very cool this time! Even the nipple is done well - so it's a step forward, Phil!
Smoothness is pretty good on the clothes and back of the leg.
Skin on the front looks bad though. Especially on the face (Werner's revenge, huh? or is it somebody' else's job?). The skin looks very thin nd almost translucent. As if all the veins and stuff showing through the skin. The hair looks like a dirty rag or mop too...
The base is OK, except for the carpet. On something which looks much like an oriental palace floor, the carpet looks thin, cheap, simiplistic, and... ugly. It might look much better on a wall of a medieval farmer's home.
Generally I think you should be satisfied - another model painted, some parts much better than on your previous works. And the shortcuts you took, seem to be your deliberate choices.
Smoothness is pretty good on the clothes and back of the leg.
Skin on the front looks bad though. Especially on the face (Werner's revenge, huh? or is it somebody' else's job?). The skin looks very thin nd almost translucent. As if all the veins and stuff showing through the skin. The hair looks like a dirty rag or mop too...
The base is OK, except for the carpet. On something which looks much like an oriental palace floor, the carpet looks thin, cheap, simiplistic, and... ugly. It might look much better on a wall of a medieval farmer's home.
Generally I think you should be satisfied - another model painted, some parts much better than on your previous works. And the shortcuts you took, seem to be your deliberate choices.
-
Demi_morgana
- Chest of Colors

- Posts: 15233
- Joined: 9 Apr 2005, o 02:51
- Location: Eldorado
- Contact:
-
Nameless
- The Better Choice

- Posts: 17415
- Joined: 21 Jun 2005, o 17:41
- Location: Silesia, Poland
- Contact:
Re: Nameless in 2010
lol, the don't make a mini of NamelessHosea wrote:If she is a private dancer, nameless may need to add an audience, lol.
Generally speaking, what Mahon said is my opinion on this mini
now, the additional problem was cast quality. Some time ago Reaper introduced a P-65 range, which consists of their already released sculpts. The difference is they use a mix containing lead for this range. Not sure if this was the reason or if it is a problem of the whole P-65 range, but cast was pretty poor. there were some imperfections, some parts were shapeless lumps of metal
and carpet is definitely a big miss
Re: Nameless in 2010
yeah, it looked like some casting imperfections. that's why I mentioned the 'revenge' bit 
and I think the skin is acceptable but not good for your current quality (as long as the photo is pretty accurate) because some parts are much better - like the back or clothes...
and I think the skin is acceptable but not good for your current quality (as long as the photo is pretty accurate) because some parts are much better - like the back or clothes...



