Chest of Colors forum

Good models, but maybe the carnifex was more impressive in person?
Not that it's a bad work, it's still masterclass, but on the pics other things seem more inspiring to me. But I know how one can misjudge when he can't see the model in the flesh.

As for your remarks, Phil, I agree. That's the difference between historical and warhammer modellers: the historical guys would criticize you for using wrong color of mud on your Vietnam diorama, wrong texture of fabric on a soldier's uniform, or too deep trench. On the other hand you can get a horse jumping over trenches, horse listening to a running tank, and stoic rider on a wild lizard in warhammer contests.

actually running tank engine isn't AS loud as it seems:
as former apc "commander" I can swear I'm not deaf

it's a huge bastard, not some pitiful apc
it's a WWI - WWII type of a tank. not a modern technology (or almost modern )

and you're not a horse, Demi... or that's what I think

soviet BWP-1 cannot be called modern

that's why I used word "almost"

illusionrip wrote:trov:ask adrian

may be some woodland scenic stuff

je suis desole je ne parle pa francais! because it's by Patrick Bini. ^^ unless they messed up the names on the site.

Phil: I got the field grass at home, but I am too st00pid to figure out how to make it look like that.

Trovarion wrote:

Nameless wrote:- bronze 40k single - why do you build trenches? to hide from enemy shooting or to ride over them on your beautiful white horse?

the question that bothers ME is, isnt that a lotr horse? (=illegal)

It's actually Balthasar Gelts Pegasus body he used, so not illegal.

yep, been told already =) nice horse and I really like the entry =) but it is a rather old model isnt it?

It.s from the previous Empire range, about 7-8 years old I think...