Page 2 of 2
Posted: 15 Mar 2006, o 21:02
by NAVARRO
really depends on point of view.... for me all are free to attend dinner
just imagine from larvae to patriach and in the process you create a genestealer cult allied to a chaos beastmen force...
Posted: 15 Mar 2006, o 21:50
by LadyEyes
Sadly, I think I've come to expect less and less from GW. Sorry to be so down on this, but I don't have high hopes when the first thing being put out has everyone playing an Inquisitor's retinue.
Posted: 16 Mar 2006, o 00:03
by mahon
7th thing, Tanya. 7th
Posted: 17 Mar 2006, o 10:41
by Nameless
Mix of s-f and medevial church power (let's call it gothic sf) is the most distinctive feature of 40k universe. It is nothing strange, that they want to concentrate on that at the beginning. They have to make a game differing from existing sf rpgames.
Now, 40 world is so big, that in fact every sf style may be adopted to it.
Posted: 25 Apr 2006, o 10:20
by endrem
I think it doesn't sound that bad. I've always loved the WFRP, I might be a bit lopsided on this, but I'm optimistic. Read the Q&A part, which is pretty new:
HERE. Black Industries (not GW) made an excellent job on the WFRP2, so I can't say I'm not curious how this one turns out
Posted: 25 Apr 2006, o 11:18
by Nameless
endrem wrote:Black Industries (not GW) made an excellent job on the WFRP2
I just regret, that they implemented D&D style of publishing - separate books for everything - rules, creatures, weapons.
Posted: 25 Apr 2006, o 11:42
by mahon
I think it's the sign of our times. But as far as contents go we should be satisfied with WFRP2
