I like it sculpting-wise. I agree the quality is better than in many of earlier sculpts. But the 'naughty bits' are a bit disturbing to me. I am not sure I am too fond of them.
But again - I think it's one of your better (and funnier) minis
Thanks for opinions
Mahon - it is just penis - You can find it i amy ancient sculptures or paintings or even at cherubs on baroque altars. I just think that fantasy creatures do not have to look like angels from "DOGMA" movie I do not remove it becouse If You can buy ceramic cherub with penis to Your garden there is nothing immoral in goblin with penis. I think that there is more controversy in some baners at cmon Penis is part of body - when I sketch naked model I never skip penis or breasts. I think that it is good Idea to scu;pt fantasy creatures in ancient sculptures style - naked and pathetic.
Scibor - I know what it is. And I am not generally shocked by nudity, but as I said - this one seems a bit disturbing to me. Not that it's anything wrong, people may actually like it. Bear in mind I really like this sculpt just think I would like it better (IMHO) without that exposed penis and testicles. But it's my personal opinion...
EDIT: and I think what bothered me was the way it was depicted - including the size, which is unnatural, as (s)he would be dragging all this stuff on the ground while walking