Re: Games Workshop
Posted: 31 Mar 2012, o 12:21
I was reading on my mobile while waiting for Iggy to fall asleep. 
Miniature painting forum for miniature painters
https://chestofcolors.com/forum/
agreed here. not sure if it's "very" weak, but too cartoonish for my vision of WFBsea.man wrote:I agree it one is very weak
OK, right!sea.man wrote:Vampire Counts were great
not so enthusiastic here, but there were quute a few great models for suresea.man wrote:Ogres were also super
good againsea.man wrote:not to mention Dar Eldars.
pretty unimaginative and some missed ideassea.man wrote:2 were not special (Tomb Kings & Necrons)
oh, thanks for mentioning the YMCA skeletonsea.man wrote:this one plus the watch tower are bad
recall the days of WFB 3rd ed. - these monsters have still been theresea.man wrote:Another thing is the idea to bring big monsters to WFB (not only dragons live in The Old World)
Actually that's one of the things which bother me the most.arctica wrote:At least PP have done a good job and kept to their vision for the game by keeping things consistent.
I think nobody can disagree they're the best plastics in fantasy/scifi gaming (I only know of comparable historical counterparts). And they became at least a match for metal GW models. Plus all the convenience of working with plastic models....arctica wrote:i actually liked GW's plastics they made painting easier, the models were easier to convert for newbies like me.
yet another voice expressing similar opinion.arctica wrote:I'm moving rapidly away from GW as i want to play more warmahordes and other games. I even tried Malifaux the other day as i have been finding 40k and Fantasy battle to be very lacking in any tactics and more of a kids game compared with other games.
No surprise. Those days when gaming was all about fun. Or at least more about fun than about winnnig...arctica wrote:I miss the RT days too.
Ariakas wrote:Another rather nice article about the new paints :
https://taleofpainters.blogspot.fr/2012/ ... h-new.html