Page 53 of 346
Posted: 31 Aug 2006, o 11:52
by endrem
Nameless wrote:What do you mean?
There was a bridge in the part with the Holy Grail, leading from one side of a chasm to the other. it was only accessible from a small cave on the side where Indiana and his mates were coming from and from the point of view it was practically invisible, because it looked like it was the other side of the chasm

.
ToMaZ wrote:I think that IRL you see too much of this mini,
You may be right on this, it would be good to see it IRL...
Posted: 31 Aug 2006, o 12:01
by Demi_morgana
yep - that was impressive scene

Posted: 31 Aug 2006, o 14:04
by NAVARRO
optic ilusions are great, when we look at old chappels paintings many created the efect that all ceiling was without corners, looking at this miniature gives lots of fresh ideas about the old techniques...
Lictor

Posted: 31 Aug 2006, o 14:48
by Nameless
ToMaZ wrote: But I still think that it only works on a picture. I think that IRL you see too much of this mini, unless you are in exactly the right spot so you're eyes only see that what the cam saw in this case.
This is very often said about NMM

Along with opinion, that 2D method should not be used for 3D
However, we should not discuss such issues here, so here's Anne Foerster's take on 54mm jungle queen. Fok, that cat look like it is alive
Hey, not that cat! The one UNDER the trunk
Click to see full-sized image
Posted: 31 Aug 2006, o 16:04
by ToMaZ
hmmmz, I remember that I didn't like that sculpt. The cat's head looked wrong, and the girl wasn't 100% correct either. But Anne made a beautifull piece out of it. Nice work.
Posted: 1 Sep 2006, o 16:22
by NAVARRO
Posted: 1 Sep 2006, o 17:14
by Nameless
1. beautiful scene!
2. cute

Posted: 2 Sep 2006, o 15:17
by Skrit
Mabel's sweet!:D
Posted: 11 Sep 2006, o 20:27
by Nameless
Posted: 11 Sep 2006, o 20:59
by Skrit
The faces are really well done! The expression (especially the eyes) are some best I've ever seen!
