Page 5 of 5
Posted: 7 Aug 2006, o 10:50
by Slawek
Mahon wrote:When I see this and GW plastic minis, I would say that GW minis are worth only to be source of bits. The rackham mini is much better as a mini.
Nameless wrote:Gareth wrote:I don't see the need to compare to rackham to gw.
Both companies offer fantastic models. Why has one got to be better then the other?
This is so true.
I agree with Gareth. So its time to stop with comparising everything to GW stuff. Most time its it done only to bash GW...
Posted: 7 Aug 2006, o 12:52
by mahon
good one, slawek
you got me!
and after seeing the size i must admit that any comparisons are definitely out of place...
Posted: 7 Aug 2006, o 13:41
by Slawek
mahon wrote: good one, slawek
you got me!
and after seeing the size i must admit that any comparisons are definitely out of place...
True, true... Size does matter...
Sławek
Posted: 12 Aug 2006, o 14:12
by NAVARRO
talking about size heres a comparative size pics
Click to see full-sized image
Click to see full-sized image
yess i will buy a couple
Posted: 12 Aug 2006, o 14:18
by Trovarion
just buy one, theres loads of bits in there
Posted: 12 Aug 2006, o 15:53
by NAVARRO
nah i need two
some nids in mind
Posted: 12 Aug 2006, o 17:02
by Demi_morgana
crap!
until now I haven't considerated playing co...