Rackham goes plastic

Slawek · Post by **Slawek** » 7 Aug 2006, o 10:50

Mahon wrote:When I see this and GW plastic minis, I would say that GW minis are worth only to be source of bits. The rackham mini is much better as a mini.

Nameless wrote:
Gareth wrote:I don't see the need to compare to rackham to gw.

Both companies offer fantastic models. Why has one got to be better then the other?
This is so true.

I agree with Gareth. So its time to stop with comparising everything to GW stuff. Most time its it done only to bash GW...

Post by **mahon** » 7 Aug 2006, o 12:52

good one, slawek

you got me!

and after seeing the size i must admit that any comparisons are definitely out of place...

Slawek · Post by **Slawek** » 7 Aug 2006, o 13:41

mahon wrote: good one, slawek you got me!

and after seeing the size i must admit that any comparisons are definitely out of place...

True, true... Size does matter...

Sławek

NAVARRO · Post by **NAVARRO** » 12 Aug 2006, o 14:12

talking about size heres a comparative size pics

Click to see full-sized image

Click to see full-sized image

yess i will buy a couple

Trovarion · Post by **Trovarion** » 12 Aug 2006, o 14:18

just buy one, theres loads of bits in there

NAVARRO · Post by **NAVARRO** » 12 Aug 2006, o 15:53

nah i need two

some nids in mind

Post by **Demi_morgana** » 12 Aug 2006, o 17:02

crap!

until now I haven't considerated playing co...