Page 39 of 346

Posted: 29 Jan 2006, o 23:12
by mahon
Excellent stuff. Fluffy at ther best, Matt's stuff is simply amazing, and Mathieul is beginning to become a worthy rival for Banshee :twisted:

Posted: 30 Jan 2006, o 10:11
by Nameless
Rich McCoy
contains nudity....

EDIT: changed the picture into a link
Mahon

Posted: 30 Jan 2006, o 12:53
by Demi_morgana
pornography!!! :shock:

:curtain: maybe next time it'll be better to post link to such picture? we're politically correct forum after all :roll: :wink:

Posted: 30 Jan 2006, o 12:57
by mahon
done :)

Posted: 30 Jan 2006, o 13:02
by Trovarion
ow....jesus...does he have that ...errection...all the time? poor demon...

Posted: 30 Jan 2006, o 13:11
by mahon
anyway the mini and the paintjob are really cool... impressive...

@trovarion: nope. you can assemble the mini in "resting" and "the other" ;) postions.... :lol:

EDIT: Took away a double posting. ;)

Skrit.

Posted: 30 Jan 2006, o 14:27
by Nameless
Demi_morgana wrote:pornography!!! :shock:

:curtain: maybe next time it'll be better to post link to such picture? we're politically correct forum after all :roll: :wink:

First of all - my sincere apologies to every person who felt offended by that photo. I have to say, that I haven't noticed that small part of the model (weel, not so small, to be honest ;) )

I do hope, that we are not completely politicaly correct :)
It is also not my intention to instruct moderators or admin of CoC, but I would like to remind just two models, which I recall (I believe there were more "nude" models), and which were published on CoC as photos, not links - gollumish creature and completely naked girl painted by Ana. Let's treat models as pieces of art (remember whole lot of clasiccal greek or roman sculptures?), not erotic (or pornographic) pictures - even if they show some nudity.

Posted: 30 Jan 2006, o 14:57
by mahon
ah ok, you're right. I feel the same, and am not easily offended by such things. Somehow the society isn't quite fair and male nudity is perceived as more offensive than female. Isn't it?
Strange...

I didn't mind the picture, but as Demi pointed to it, I thought changing it won't be a problem.
No, we're not totally politically correct, as I find it pretty ridiculous. I just know there are children visiting the website, and don't want really offensive stuff posted in such a way which could make somebody see something which could offend them. I think it's like the old pornography/erotic issue. There's some stuff which can easily be considered offensive - scenes of sex, pervert violence, female close-ups into the... intimate parts of body... You know what I mean.

I also think that nudity can be art, and the mini you posted was both a fantastic sculpt and a great paintjob, and I wasn't offended by it, but... male organ in such erection ... can be offensive for more delicate souls.
;)

Posted: 30 Jan 2006, o 15:52
by Demi_morgana
Nameless wrote:First of all - my sincere apologies to every person who felt offended by that photo. I have to say, that I haven't noticed that small part of the model (weel, not so small, to be honest ;) )
:curtain: well I'd like to explain I am not offended by any means because of this photo or any of the pics posted on this site (even if they have "sexual" character... :oops: )
I have nothing againt nudity etc but I know that people registered here may have different views on this case so I decided to point it :)

Posted: 30 Jan 2006, o 15:55
by mahon
If there is anybody whom I would suspect of being easily offended by nudity, it wouldn't be you, Demi... ;)