Page 36 of 164

Posted: 27 Dec 2007, o 14:50
by mahon
why do they make Cygnar if nobody likes the poor guys? :think:

Posted: 27 Dec 2007, o 14:54
by Demi_morgana
maybe it's kind of gw-tactics:
if nobody wants to buy our silly-looking army lets give them really high statistics & overbalanced rules? like lizardmen? :mrgreen: :razz:

Posted: 27 Dec 2007, o 17:05
by LadyEyes
Poor Cygnar... they just don't have the cool factor that other factions have. They're the humans in a 2nd ed AD&D world... just not special enough to get played.

Posted: 28 Dec 2007, o 01:03
by Morf
Actually in my neighborhood there is mostly Cygnar players. Come on,
what is NOT cool about gunmages, lightning weapons and Haley?

There's a Idrian Skirmisher UA preview up as well. very nice!

Posted: 28 Dec 2007, o 08:28
by Demi_morgana
here's the LINK to the pic - another missed release imo :roll:
maybe I'm just waiting for sth decent for cryx? ^^

and as for the gunmages - they're ubercool! probably the best cygnar unit at my taste

Posted: 28 Dec 2007, o 11:05
by ToMaZ
Gunmages are cool in fluff, but on the field they cost too many points and are too easily reduced to pulp by area of effect templates...

And the idrian skirmishers UA is cool :) but I don't play menoth :P

Posted: 28 Dec 2007, o 14:34
by Morf
I'm not sure what UA can Cephalyx get... Probably a big Drudge (read: Brute Thrall II) since I don't think there will be a another Cephalyx Slaver. Or maybe Cryx will get Cephalyx solo?

Posted: 28 Dec 2007, o 15:11
by Demi_morgana
I'm not fan of mindslaves unfortunatelly :(
hope I'll change my mind when the ua will be released :)

Posted: 3 Jan 2008, o 08:56
by Demi_morgana
new stuff: CEPHALYX OVERLORDS and KAYAZY UNDERBOSS - these cephalyxes ain't that bad actually ^^

Posted: 3 Jan 2008, o 08:59
by mahon
right. not quite my style but could be easily adjusted :D