Page 3 of 7
Re: GW Beastmen
Posted: 28 Dec 2009, o 15:15
by Maru
"breasts in the dork" wel it is me or this limited standard bearer looks like onef rom plastic spure ??
well they would relise a good looking minotaur .. i wouldadd it to my Mordheim Warband ... well good centigor to (GW Minotaurs look like ... well you know how they look ... -_- ' )
Re: GW Beastmen
Posted: 28 Dec 2009, o 16:42
by mahon
as much as some new concepts can be good and feel like some fresh air, I don't think they're badly needed.
just see how other companies can make nice miniatures in similar themes as GW but somehow better looking (to name AoW only)...
Re: GW Beastmen
Posted: 8 Jan 2010, o 09:44
by sea.man
Re: GW Beastmen
Posted: 8 Jan 2010, o 09:49
by Nameless
oink, oink
previous "red' beastmen army was looking better,
Re: GW Beastmen
Posted: 8 Jan 2010, o 10:51
by arctica
I agree with phil on this one. Im not keen on those big hairless minotaur things either. Their faces remind me of Da Vinci's ugly old men sketch.
Re: GW Beastmen
Posted: 8 Jan 2010, o 13:11
by Corvus
I had some hopes for some good looking characters, but they are lost now.
Re: GW Beastmen
Posted: 8 Jan 2010, o 15:18
by Marek
Well, the shaman looks OK.
They have changed the concept completely. New creatures - old name.
I'm not a big fan of those.
Re: GW Beastmen
Posted: 8 Jan 2010, o 15:22
by Nameless
the shaman is very old
I mean the mini is old
Re: GW Beastmen
Posted: 8 Jan 2010, o 15:39
by Scibor
Minotaurs look like buldogs and chau chau mix
I just start sculpting my own minotaur
Re: GW Beastmen
Posted: 8 Jan 2010, o 15:44
by Demi_morgana
just watch out for violating ip - after all it's gw who invented minotaurs!
