New Dark Angels!

Another website published something interesting about minis?
Slawek

Post by Slawek »

We hate shouting GW minis...
We hate shooting GW Minis ...
We hate GW minis with fist above their head...
We hate GW minis pointing with their finger...
We hate static GW minis...

Sorry, I just found funny that most people have enough of "in action" positioned Marines. And when GW make at last some static, not shouting marines, everybody start whinning that their are too static.

Saying that, I must say that I agree with Mahon "Pretty boring and overdetailed for me"
They look a little bit too top heavy
mahon
Super Villain
Super Villain
Posts: 23961
Joined: 31 Mar 2005, o 23:36
Location: Poznan, Poland
Contact:

Post by mahon »

Slawek wrote:Sorry, I just found funny that most people have enough of "in action" positioned Marines.
really? if it's true, it's funny....
I always liked action poses of GW minis. Well, maybe except for some strange and awkwardly positioned minis like the boss of Crimson Fists (Cortez?), was never too fond of Shrike, never liked Lemartes too much, and some of the new Chaplains were funny... IronHand Strakken was flat and boring, definitely up to the standards of other minis of its time.

There were many great minis in action poses though...
-- Mahoń

Image

Back in the garage with my bullshit detector
Nameless
The Better Choice
The Better Choice
Posts: 17415
Joined: 21 Jun 2005, o 17:41
Location: Silesia, Poland
Contact:

Post by Nameless »

Nope.
Nope.
Nope.
Nope.
Yes. To be more specific - any company static minis.

You're using very generic statements, Slawek. "most people", "everybody", etc. You're not replying to "everybody" but to people, who posted in this very thread. Please, show me my post/statement, where I said, that I hate gw minis you specified (shouting, shooting etc.).

I know, that you're a 40k player (I play it, too) and GW-models fan. I'm sure you understand, that some of us are not. We have every right to criticize any company. I've not spotted GW bashing on this forum. Yes, we criticize this copmany quite often - just like we criticize every other company, who presents (by themselves or by fans) minis on CoC.
Image
NAVARRO
Mr. Bug-Man
Posts: 2747
Joined: 17 May 2005, o 09:18
Location: Portugal
Contact:

Post by NAVARRO »

ImageClick to see full-sized image

seriously! :lol:

GW doesnt need us to bash it... they even closed their forums just not hear people :clap:

lets see if i dont love ALL that GW makes i cant speak my mind about it?
yeah right.
guess what

nop
nop
nop
yep
yep

so, im whinning! :P
Image
Image
Demi_morgana
Chest of Colors
Chest of Colors
Posts: 15233
Joined: 9 Apr 2005, o 02:51
Location: Eldorado
Contact:

Post by Demi_morgana »

as for me:
the only thing I really don't like in DA "rectangled" model is super-doooper combi weapon... I wonder if it include microwave oven and hair dryer too... :roll:
and about GW minis: "there's no time to discriminate" -> I don't like space marines models: any pose, any chapter... :?
maybe I just saw too much of them :?
Image

Hobby blog

Katoliku uważaj!
Slawek

Post by Slawek »

NAVARRO wrote: lets see if i dont love ALL that GW makes i cant speak my mind about it?
yeah right.
guess what

so, im whinning! :P
:roll:
Try too read with understanding Nav, or ask me if you do not understand intentions behind my post
In my post I mean than some people are never happy
I will not defend GW or they products. I do not like those sculpt too. I say that I agree with Mahon critics. His critics is constructive...
I just found that critics expressed like this "That mini sucks because its static" is retarded. I do not like to read it and I will whinning about this.
Its only my opinion, so do what you like

EOT
NAVARRO
Mr. Bug-Man
Posts: 2747
Joined: 17 May 2005, o 09:18
Location: Portugal
Contact:

Post by NAVARRO »

Slawek wrote:
Try too read with understanding Nav, or ask me if you do not understand intentions behind my post
In my post I mean than some people are never happy
I will not defend GW or they products. I do not like those sculpt too. I say that I agree with Mahon critics. His critics is constructive...
I just found that critics expressed like this "That mini sucks because its static" is retarded. I do not like to read it and I will whinning about this.
Its only my opinion, so do what you like

EOT
im really not curious about your intentions :lol: i think thats quite clear with the cat pic mate...
so apart from whining people now those that dislike a mini due to its stactic positioning and express that opinion are... retarded?
Man take a cold shower :lol:
Image
Image
ToMaZ
Expects too much, too
Posts: 4922
Joined: 10 May 2005, o 19:17
Location: Belgium, Maasmechelen
Contact:

Post by ToMaZ »

Just a reminder to keep it friendly.
Don't let this go into another flame war by provoking others. Everyone has their own opinions, and the right to share it as long as it's in a friendly way.

-ToMaZ-
---ToMaZ---

Try honesty...
Herge

Post by Herge »

Just to clarify, are we talking about these minis being NEW Dark Angles models to the GW range or new to coolminiornot.com

This is just because they are clearly both converted models. I'm not sure what the model on the left is converted from but the guy on the right is the original 1980s production GW Dark Angels Captain.

https://demonwinner.free.fr/uk/1991/gold ... ategorie=1

Thats a link to the 1991 Golden Demon 40k winner and its the same model.

So those of you who may have thought they were new GW models can relax ;)
Demi_morgana
Chest of Colors
Chest of Colors
Posts: 15233
Joined: 9 Apr 2005, o 02:51
Location: Eldorado
Contact:

Post by Demi_morgana »

looks like gw turned into old-school fashion...
lets wait for re-editioned "red period" then :twisted:
Image

Hobby blog

Katoliku uważaj!
Post Reply