Page 124 of 164
Re: Privateer Press news
Posted: 14 Apr 2011, o 12:07
by NAVARRO
Pandadosmares wrote:They might be huge metal chunks but they are fragile so price vs quality is for me all wrong, and i do like their minis
Fragile? Generally PP designs go for the bulky metal, even weapon staffs are kind of thick in comparison to other companies so I dont see these as fragile, by the contrary... I mean thick huge chunks of metal is as resistant as it gets.
Re: Privateer Press news
Posted: 14 Apr 2011, o 12:12
by ToMaZ
@ Nav: OK you're right. Banes have always been big and these seem to be as large as medium based figs. But seeing that price tag in a store would definitely have me think twice about buying them.
I wonder why they didn't go for plastics on these...
Re: Privateer Press news
Posted: 14 Apr 2011, o 12:17
by NAVARRO
Yeah I think these are perfect candidates to plastics... I would nevertheless prefer the metals... I love the weight of the minis man

Mind im not saying these are cheap... these are expensive but you also get a lot of big metals in it... I only get pissed when a sprue of plastic costs more than X...
Re: Privateer Press news
Posted: 14 Apr 2011, o 12:21
by Pandadosmares
NAVARRO wrote:Pandadosmares wrote:
They might be huge metal chunks but they are fragile so price vs quality is for me all wrong, and i do like their minis
Fragile? Generally PP designs go for the bulky metal, even weapon staffs are kind of thick in comparison to other companies so I dont see these as fragile, by the contrary... I mean thick huge chunks of metal is as resistant as it gets.
Warjacks are really fragile
Re: Privateer Press news
Posted: 14 Apr 2011, o 12:36
by NAVARRO
Ok heres my personal opinion on this
PP overall range goes from big beasts to small infantry, most are metal ( but that is slowly changing )... they are most of the times a pain in the ass to assemble, metal kits designs are thick and sturdy... some models and some warkacks have week elbow joints but man you cannot claim this to be the majority of the PP range... PP model quality goes from utter crap to cool cartoony style so in short...
- 50% are cool models
- 50% are ugly butt models
- 10% have week elbows
- 80% are big bulky metals
- 20% resin/plastic stuff
- 120% requires pins and are a nightmare to assemble
- 100% of net percentages are totally off

Re: Privateer Press news
Posted: 14 Apr 2011, o 15:05
by Skrit
NAVARRO wrote: - 120% requires pins and are a nightmare to assemble
AMEN! My Skorne starterbox threw me of doing anything PP again probably forever!

Re: Privateer Press news
Posted: 14 Apr 2011, o 15:14
by ToMaZ
Well, the skorne battlebox is probably the worst of them all

Re: Privateer Press news
Posted: 14 Apr 2011, o 16:22
by Pandadosmares
I
Skrit wrote:NAVARRO wrote:
- 120% requires pins and are a nightmare to assemble
I was not even talking about this, but only the metal quality, but this one is really funny, i give a example, assembling the Khador Drago Heavy Warjack, he has some chains that are cutted right in the middle and are supposed to be glued

i just ask how?

this is for gamming not to sit tight

and i had to rebuild a part of a arm it bended then just broke
but i still like them, and yes they are a big pain to assemble
Re: Privateer Press news
Posted: 14 Apr 2011, o 16:49
by NAVARRO
Its part of the fun to assemble these models... in a masochist way

Trollbloods are not that bad to be honest.
Re: Privateer Press news
Posted: 14 Apr 2011, o 22:51
by mahon
I thought Kingdom Death was aimed at masochists, sado-masochists, and many other kinds of perverts
