Page 2 of 105

Re: Games Workshop news

Posted: 19 Jan 2010, o 11:45
by Scibor
Horse of Saruman is painted like space marine with bright lines on edges :)
I like this miniatures but paintig do not helps them.

Re: Games Workshop news

Posted: 19 Jan 2010, o 12:04
by arctica
Actually this internet connection is weird i can't see the images. So i can't see what's written or what the models are like. Wait until i get back into the office ! :)

Re: Games Workshop news

Posted: 19 Jan 2010, o 22:12
by loler
I think the nazgul is quite awesome. I dont like the rest though.

Re: Games Workshop news

Posted: 20 Jan 2010, o 09:22
by arctica
hmm, well i've never really been fond of the whole LoTR stuff but the nazgul is fairly decent.

Re: Games Workshop news

Posted: 20 Jan 2010, o 09:48
by Nameless
nazgul gets small "ok" from, rest - big "meh"

Re: Games Workshop news

Posted: 20 Jan 2010, o 12:44
by superhessianv
What happened to GW minis???
They kicked out all their decent modelers or what?
Thumbs down for all of them.

Re: Games Workshop news

Posted: 20 Jan 2010, o 13:20
by flagoon
They are lazy because people are buying their minis mainly for playing. It could look like piece of poo and cost small fortune, but unless it has 6 attacks for zillion damage (I've never played, so I don't know if its OK) it'll still be a bestseller. So why even try?

Re: Games Workshop news

Posted: 20 Jan 2010, o 15:07
by Morf
arctica wrote:depends if it's multipart ;) but it won't be far off.
It is actually more expensive than the metal one. You get the Witch King option and another beast head option though.

Re: Games Workshop news

Posted: 20 Jan 2010, o 15:27
by arctica
Its amusing, because i remember a while ago GW said they were trying to make plastic models because metal ones were expensive and yet these days we find plastics more expensive than metal models.

Re: Games Workshop news

Posted: 20 Jan 2010, o 16:04
by mahon
yeah, but they offer you many more options. as a 40K player you surely noticed the difference :)