Page 2 of 105
Re: Games Workshop news
Posted: 19 Jan 2010, o 11:45
by Scibor
Horse of Saruman is painted like space marine with bright lines on edges

I like this miniatures but paintig do not helps them.
Re: Games Workshop news
Posted: 19 Jan 2010, o 12:04
by arctica
Actually this internet connection is weird i can't see the images. So i can't see what's written or what the models are like. Wait until i get back into the office !

Re: Games Workshop news
Posted: 19 Jan 2010, o 22:12
by loler
I think the nazgul is quite awesome. I dont like the rest though.
Re: Games Workshop news
Posted: 20 Jan 2010, o 09:22
by arctica
hmm, well i've never really been fond of the whole LoTR stuff but the nazgul is fairly decent.
Re: Games Workshop news
Posted: 20 Jan 2010, o 09:48
by Nameless
nazgul gets small "ok" from, rest - big "meh"
Re: Games Workshop news
Posted: 20 Jan 2010, o 12:44
by superhessianv
What happened to GW minis???
They kicked out all their decent modelers or what?
Thumbs down for all of them.
Re: Games Workshop news
Posted: 20 Jan 2010, o 13:20
by flagoon
They are lazy because people are buying their minis mainly for playing. It could look like piece of poo and cost small fortune, but unless it has 6 attacks for zillion damage (I've never played, so I don't know if its OK) it'll still be a bestseller. So why even try?
Re: Games Workshop news
Posted: 20 Jan 2010, o 15:07
by Morf
arctica wrote:depends if it's multipart

but it won't be far off.
It is actually more expensive than the metal one. You get the Witch King option and another beast head option though.
Re: Games Workshop news
Posted: 20 Jan 2010, o 15:27
by arctica
Its amusing, because i remember a while ago GW said they were trying to make plastic models because metal ones were expensive and yet these days we find plastics more expensive than metal models.
Re: Games Workshop news
Posted: 20 Jan 2010, o 16:04
by mahon
yeah, but they offer you many more options. as a 40K player you surely noticed the difference
