Posted: 23 Feb 2006, o 13:18
I also think it's a wyvern (or even vywern! 
)
the guys from rackham don't know what they are talking about!
)the guys from rackham don't know what they are talking about!
Chest of Colors forum
Miniature painting forum for miniature painters
https://chestofcolors.com/forum/
Confrontation Dragon...
Page 2 of 4
Posted: 23 Feb 2006, o 13:52
Very nice although I feel the head is too Dinosaur like to me... Nevertheless, cool! (I'd say Wyvern too btw!)
Posted: 23 Feb 2006, o 14:05
don't make fun of my spellingDemi_morgana wrote:(or even vywern!
- trying to type fast on this keyboard makes me mad... it's bigger than the previous one and I am still not used to it. 
Posted: 23 Feb 2006, o 14:26
sorry chief :rose:
Posted: 23 Feb 2006, o 14:39
Same with me. Except, that I have just found dragon for me. Perhaps it is not perfect, but taking all aspects (overall look, pose, size and price of course) into consideration I think I'm gonna buy this babyNAVARRO wrote:well cool mini but i have to confess im on a quest for the perfect dragon mini for years now , its like my unicorn... simply cant seem to find one... but this one is one of the best...
Wyvern vs dragon
reptile, wings, four legs - dragon
reptile, wings, two legs - wyvern
Not that I really care how this model is named. Look is more important than a name
BTW, I don't like that wyvern
Posted: 23 Feb 2006, o 14:47
That's also a nice looking Dragon there Nameless.
Posted: 23 Feb 2006, o 14:53
you're right, Nameless and this dragon is great, indeed
and this dragon is great, indeedPosted: 23 Feb 2006, o 14:53
nice mini from reaper Nameless althoug still a bit far of my idea of perfect dragon mini... im just extra picky about dragons.
the one you showed has big flaws... pose to boring, a bit undetailed scales, chest scales above back scales (should be otherwise) dorsal barbatan to "aquatic" for dragon, wings need more detail etc....
flaws on rackham one are beak head, tail to fat short and almost look like a tentacle also scales so diverse that its a mesh of strange paterns and the classical error short and fat wings that dont have structure for a fly creature...
heck im really picky.
the one you showed has big flaws... pose to boring, a bit undetailed scales, chest scales above back scales (should be otherwise) dorsal barbatan to "aquatic" for dragon, wings need more detail etc....
flaws on rackham one are beak head, tail to fat short and almost look like a tentacle also scales so diverse that its a mesh of strange paterns and the classical error short and fat wings that dont have structure for a fly creature...
heck im really picky.
Posted: 23 Feb 2006, o 15:10
yes, you areNAVARRO wrote:heck im really picky.
and just like me, you'll reach the point, when you will realize, that you finally have to choose one, even if it is not perfect
this is of course the matter of individual preferences. I'm not trying to convince anyone, just stating, that my personal quest for a dragon is completednice mini from reaper Nameless althoug still a bit far of my idea of perfect dragon mini
Posted: 23 Feb 2006, o 16:07
Hehehe, knowing Nav he'd probably make one himself in his own unique vision!;)