Cmon pics of the day...

Post by **mahon** » 29 Jan 2006, o 23:12

Excellent stuff. Fluffy at ther best, Matt's stuff is simply amazing, and Mathieul is beginning to become a worthy rival for Banshee

Post by **Nameless** » 30 Jan 2006, o 10:11

Rich McCoy
contains nudity....

EDIT: changed the picture into a link
Mahon

Post by **Demi_morgana** » 30 Jan 2006, o 12:53

pornography!!!

maybe next time it'll be better to post link to such picture? we're politically correct forum after all

Post by **mahon** » 30 Jan 2006, o 12:57

done

Trovarion · Post by **Trovarion** » 30 Jan 2006, o 13:02

ow....jesus...does he have that ...errection...all the time? poor demon...

Post by **mahon** » 30 Jan 2006, o 13:11

anyway the mini and the paintjob are really cool... impressive...

@trovarion: nope. you can assemble the mini in "resting" and "the other"

postions....

EDIT: Took away a double posting.

Skrit.

Post by **Nameless** » 30 Jan 2006, o 14:27

Demi_morgana wrote:pornography!!!

maybe next time it'll be better to post link to such picture? we're politically correct forum after all

First of all - my sincere apologies to every person who felt offended by that photo. I have to say, that I haven't noticed that small part of the model (weel, not so small, to be honest

)

I do hope, that we are not completely politicaly correct

It is also not my intention to instruct moderators or admin of CoC, but I would like to remind just two models, which I recall (I believe there were more "nude" models), and which were published on CoC as photos, not links - gollumish creature and completely naked girl painted by Ana. Let's treat models as pieces of art (remember whole lot of clasiccal greek or roman sculptures?), not erotic (or pornographic) pictures - even if they show some nudity.

Post by **mahon** » 30 Jan 2006, o 14:57

ah ok, you're right. I feel the same, and am not easily offended by such things. Somehow the society isn't quite fair and male nudity is perceived as more offensive than female. Isn't it?
Strange...

I didn't mind the picture, but as Demi pointed to it, I thought changing it won't be a problem.
No, we're not totally politically correct, as I find it pretty ridiculous. I just know there are children visiting the website, and don't want really offensive stuff posted in such a way which could make somebody see something which could offend them. I think it's like the old pornography/erotic issue. There's some stuff which can easily be considered offensive - scenes of sex, pervert violence, female close-ups into the... intimate parts of body... You know what I mean.

I also think that nudity can be art, and the mini you posted was both a fantastic sculpt and a great paintjob, and I wasn't offended by it, but... male organ in such erection ... can be offensive for more delicate souls.

Post by **Demi_morgana** » 30 Jan 2006, o 15:52

Nameless wrote:First of all - my sincere apologies to every person who felt offended by that photo. I have to say, that I haven't noticed that small part of the model (weel, not so small, to be honest )

well I'd like to explain I am not offended by any means because of this photo or any of the pics posted on this site (even if they have "sexual" character...

)
I have nothing againt nudity etc but I know that people registered here may have different views on this case so I decided to point it

Post by **mahon** » 30 Jan 2006, o 15:55

If there is anybody whom I would suspect of being easily offended by nudity, it wouldn't be you, Demi...